What would I say to Mr Shearer? First, there will never be a polarised situation in which he must act which will not involve such threats. The only way that he can avoid such threats is to do nothing, on anything at all. If he wants to play to a Right-defined middle ground (as the Right commentators are clearly directing him), he will be an empty vessel. Second, we don't have the luxury of timing big events to suit us. This dispute, and its escalation, has been timed deliberately. It coincides with National's election victory, its proposed ER changes and the delight that will be felt in National circles that Mr Shearer has been put on the spot. Third, when will there ever be an issue more important for a Labour Party? This is a concerted managerial attack on a workers' union involving a range of issue which area anathema to Labour supporters - contracting out, privatisation, unfettered management control, creating the conditions for further attacks on other groups of organised workers.
What he can say is clear:
- longer-term issues about port capacity are important, and should not be resolved by means of industrial disputes
- this dispute can be solved without recourse to the nuclear threat of contracting-out
- the facilities of the DoL and other agencies should be brought to bear on the dispute
- the Supercity should caution the Ports management that escalation of the dispute does not meet the owners' requirements
- this is not the way to manage ER problems
Excellent advice, Robert, I hope Mr Shearer takes note!
ReplyDelete